Supporting Victims and Survivors of Family Violence after Separation: Property Settlements and Spousal Maintenance

The Family Court’s approach to acknowledging family violence in property settlements and spousal maintenance claims under the Family Law Act 1975 has changed as of 10 June 2025.

Why the change?

There is increasing recognition of the prevalence of family violence within the community and the risks posed to parties going through separation.

Changes to the Family Law Act 1975 were made to help address the economic consequences that victims and survivors of family violence experience during and following separation.

These changes are intended to provide the Family Court with broader discretion to consider the economic impact of family violence to ensure settlement outcomes are just and equitable and that parties are provided with proper financial maintenance following separation.

Key changes

1] The definition of Family Violence under section 4AB of the Act has been amended to encapsulate a broader range of economic and financial abuse.

This has been done by repealing the existing references to economic and financial abuse and placing examples of economic and financial abuse into their own separate provision.  Examples of behaviour that may constitute economic and financial abuse include:

1. unreasonably denying a family member the financial autonomy that the family member would otherwise have had, such as by;

   a] forcibly controlling the family member's money or assets, including superannuation; or

   b] sabotaging the family member's employment or income, or potential employment or income; or

   c] forcing the family member to take on a financial or legal liability, or status; or

   d] forcibly or without the family member's knowledge, accumulating debt in the family member's name;

2. unreasonably withholding financial support needed to meet the reasonable living expenses of a family member, or a family member's child;

3. coercing a family member (including by use of threats, physical abuse or emotional or psychological abuse):
   a] to give or seek money, assets or other items as dowry; or

   b] to do or agree to things in connection with a practice of dowry;

4. hiding or falsely denying things done or agreed to by a family member, including hiding or falsely denying the receipt of money, assets or other items, in connection with a practice of dowry.

2] Family violence is a factor that may be considered in spousal maintenance claims under section 75(2).

The effect of any family violence to which one party has subjected or exposed the other party, including on any of the matters mentioned in section 75(2) (such as the health of a party) must now be considered by the Family Court when considering spousal maintenance claims.

This amendment recognises that family violence may impact a party’s need for spousal maintenance. For example, a party may not be able to leave the family home because they cannot afford the expense of alternative accommodation or because they have been restrained from having their own bank account or access to their own funds.

This amendment is intended to ensure parties are provided with sufficient maintenance at the end of a relationship, and it is not intended to be punitive or compensatory.

3] Family violence is also a relevant consideration under the property settlement framework under section 79.

Family violence can be considered by the Family Court when assessing parties’ contributions to the relationship, as well as any future needs of the parties, when determining a property settlement.

This acknowledges that family violence may have impacted a party’s ability to contribute to the relationship and also their future circumstances. For example, one party may have prevented the other from engaging in employment during the relationship, thereby limiting their financial contributions. This act of family violence, in turn, may impact a party’s ability to gain meaningful employment in the future.

If you would like confidential and specialist advice about your particular circumstances, contact us today to arrange an appointment by email at info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or call 02 6225 7040 or get started now online.

Addbacks in Property Settlements: Shinohara v Shinohara [2025] FedCFamC1A 126

The Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia recently confirmed in Shinohara v Shinohara [2025] FedCFamC1A 126 that 'addbacks' are to no longer form part of the balance sheet in property proceedings. This results from the Family Law Amendment Act 2024, which came into effect in June 2025.

Previously, Courts could notionally “add back” assets that no longer existed at the time of a hearing, for example, money that has been wasted or spent by one party on legal fees. Even though the asset no longer existed, its value could still be included in the asset pool for division.

The Court has now confirmed that only existing property at the time of trial is to be included in the balance sheet for division. Williams, Altobelli and Campton JJ state at [121] “The text of s 79(3)(a)(i) is clear. Only the existing property of the parties is to be identified, and only that existing property is to be divided or adjusted.”

Notwithstanding the above, the principles underpinning the existence of addbacks have not been disregarded entirely. Williams, Altobelli and Campton JJ continue at [125]: “s79 now directs that the categories identified in Omacini pre-amendment that were notionally added back are to be considered in ensuring a just and equitable outcome, either by way of historical contributions, or by way of their relationship to and impact upon the current and future circumstances at the s 79(5) stage.”

The Full Court further noted: “The holistic approach in assessing and determining contributions and adjustments thereto…remains applicable. Each of the considerations, by either s 79(4) or s 79(5), requires engagement with the circumstances of the disposal of property, the value it achieved, and its use and application being considered and weighed to achieve the mandate of justice and equity that permeates s 79 of the Act” [126].

The conclusion reached by the Court in Shinohara suggests the approach taken to the disposal of assets in property proceedings will need to change. Parties can no longer rely on assets being notionally added back to the property pool and will instead need to seek that these matters form part of the Court’s holistic assessment of the parties’ current and future circumstances.

You may wish to seek specialist family law advice about your circumstances, particularly if you are concerned your ex-partner is reducing your combined property pool. If you would like to discuss your matter and how we can assist you, please contact us today on (02) 6225 7040 by email info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Guiding you through Family Court proceedings – Dispute Resolution

If your matter is already in Court, you may be wondering what happens next. Whilst you may be aware of the initial steps, the procedural pathway isn’t always clear to parties involved in Court proceedings.

The first time that your matter comes before the Court is usually the first return (see our blog post about the first return here if you have not already). If there are issues in dispute which require immediate determination, it may be necessary for your matter to be listed for an interim hearing (see also here for our blog post about the interim hearing).

After your matter has been listed for a first return and/or interim hearing, the next time your matter comes before the Court will likely be for a further directions hearing where a Judicial Registrar is likely to make orders about the future progression of your matter. This can occur at a further directions hearing; orders can be made at the conclusion of an Interim Hearing; or judicial officers will often grant leave to parties to provide consent orders for the Court’s consideration if the parties reach agreement about procedural matters (on an interim or final basis about any issues in dispute).

After any necessary interim hearing and prior to your matter being listed for a final hearing, it is likely that a judicial officer (such as a Judicial Registrar, a Senior Judicial Registrar or a Judge) will require parties in a matter to participate in dispute resolution. Dispute resolution can include a mediation, a family dispute resolution conference or a conciliation conference. The dispute resolution process can be Court-based or external, such as a private provider or through Legal Aid.

In a property matter where both parties have funds and financial resources available to them, parties may choose to participate in a private mediation whereby they select their preferred mediator. Orders providing for the parties to participate in a private mediation can usually be reached by agreement.  If there is disagreement about the proposed mediator and/or payment of the mediator’s fees, a Judicial Registrar can make orders to determine these issues.

Alternatively, the Court can make orders providing for the parties to participate in a Court-based dispute resolution process, on the basis the Court is satisfied that this is appropriate, having regard to the means and resources available to the parties.

In a property matter, parties may be ordered to participate in a Conciliation Conference with a judicial registrar. A significant benefit to participating in this dispute resolution process is that if you reach a final agreement on the day, orders can be made to finalise your matter, and you can exit the Court system.

Parties are expected to engage in good-faith negotiations and make a genuine effort to resolve issues in dispute. At the conclusion of the dispute resolution process, a dispute resolution certificate is issued by the judicial registrar. If the Court finds that a party has not participated in good faith and/or has not made a genuine effort to resolve the issues in dispute, there can be cost consequences as a result of a party’s actions.

Prior to participating in a dispute resolution event, parties are expected to exchange relevant financial disclosures and, for property matters, obtain updated valuations if necessary. In a parenting matter, it can often be useful to participate in dispute resolution following the release of an expert report, such as a Child Impact Report or a Family Report.

If you are at the stage of your matter where you are considering participating in a dispute resolution process, it is worthwhile to engage a family lawyer to advise and guide you. A family lawyer will be able to identify any steps that need to be taken before participating in a dispute resolution process, and provide you with guidance as to possible settlement outcomes. They can also make sure you have the best possible chance of success in a dispute resolution process.

Our specialist family lawyers here at Robinson + McGuinness can assist you at any stage of your matter, including at the dispute resolution process.  To arrange an appointment with one of our family lawyers, please complete the enquiry form below or call us on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au, or get started now online.

What do I need to disclose? Changes to the duty of financial disclosure under the Family Law Act 1975

During family law negotiations and proceedings, all parties have an ongoing obligation to provide full and frank financial disclosure.

From 10 June 2025, the importance of the duty of financial disclosure has been elevated. The Family Law Amendment Act 2024 has codified the duty of disclosure by inserting new disclosure provisions in the Family Law Act 1975.  This new framework provides parties and practitioners with clarity about the scope of the duty and the consequences of failing to comply with the duty.

The duty of disclosure is now part of the Family Law Act 1975 under sections 71B (in the case of marriages) and 90RI (in the case of de facto relationships). The new sections confirm the following:

1. Parties have a duty to both the court and each other to provide ongoing full and frank disclosure on time;
   If you receive a reasonable request for financial disclosure from the other party, it should be answered in a reasonable timeframe. You are also entitled to ask for the equivalent disclosure of the other party, so long as it is in their possession or control.

2. The duty applies for the duration of the proceedings.
   This includes from when negotiations commence until final orders or a financial agreement are made.

3. The Court has the power to impose consequences on a party if they do not comply with its duty of disclosure.
   The Court may:

   1. Take the failure into account when making an order for the alteration of property interests under section 79;

   2. Make any orders concerning disclosure that the court considers appropriate;

   3. Make an order for costs that the court considers just;

   4. Impose sanctions;

   5. Punish a party for contempt; or

   6. Stay or dismiss all or part of the proceedings.

4. The duty extends to information known to the party and documents that have been in their possession or control, as well as information and documents prescribed by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021.

   This includes information and documents relating to a party’s income and any of their financial resources, assets, liabilities and superannuation. Some documents that are often requested or exchanged are bank statements, tax returns, superannuation statements, share statements and online car valuations.

5. There is now a higher standard expected of legal practitioners when advising clients about their duty of disclosure.

   Legal practitioners must provide their clients with information about their duty of disclosure and the consequences of non-compliance with their duty of disclosure. Legal practitioners must also encourage clients to take all necessary steps to comply with their duty of disclosure.

If you are unsure about your legal obligations in relation to the provision of financial disclosure, you should seek legal advice. Contact Robinson + McGuinness to arrange an appointment on (02) 6225 7040, by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.