Choosing your family lawyer

Separation is a deeply personal matter. When you are involved in the breakdown of a relationship and need to seek advice, you will often need to share private information with your advisor.

Your lawyer will ask you questions about matters that you may otherwise consider to be private, however it is important that they have as much information as possible to be able to advise you accurately. For example, in a property matter, your lawyer will ask you what your income is. They may ask how you divided your household chores and how much you contributed towards the purchase of your house. In a parenting matter, your lawyer may ask who was more involved in bedtime and bath-time in the first few years of your child’s life.

You may need to discuss the state of your physical and mental health. This may lead you to disclose information about any treatment you receive, or how you coped with your separation. The information you provide will shape the legal advice you receive, which will ultimately impact on the decisions you make for your future.  

Given how much you need to share in a family law matter, it is crucial that you select the right lawyer. You need to feel comfortable with the advice you are receiving. First and foremost, you need to feel secure in sharing private and personal information with your lawyer in the knowledge that they will use that information to provide you with appropriate and accurate advice.

Whilst your lawyer may not be your best friend, you need to be able to work with your lawyer. When you meet with a lawyer, for example when you attend an initial appointment, you will have a ‘feel’ of what they are like and how they will approach your matter. At the early stage of your matter, it is useful to discuss what the process is for resolving your legal matter and which direction they see your matter going.

Many clients opt for a boutique approach to their matter in contrast to a ‘big’ corporate firm. A boutique family law firm can provide an extra level of comfort, where the firm’s Directors have oversight on your matter, and you can feel assured that your matter is progressing in a strategic direction.

It is also important for your lawyer to have a broad network. Family law matters regularly require a multidisciplinary approach, involving accountants, property valuers, psychologists and other experts. Your lawyer will draw on their knowledge and connections to assist you in reaching an early resolution of your matter where possible.

Here at Robinson + McGuinness, our family lawyers have a wide range of expertise and extensive networks to assist you with your family law matter. To arrange an appointment with one of our lawyers, please contact our office on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Anika Buckley 

Applying for Probate and Letters of Administration

Losing a loved one is an emotionally challenging experience and the responsibility of administering their estate can feel overwhelming. There are a number of financial and legal processes involved in managing a deceased person’s assets and liabilities, and this may include applying for a grant of probate or letters of administration.

What is an executor?

An executor is a person appointed by the deceased to manage their estate after they pass away. The executor is responsible for collecting assets, paying debts and distributing assets to beneficiaries in accordance with the deceased’s wishes.   

What is probate?

A grant of probate authorises an executor to manage the estate of a deceased person in accordance with their will. To apply for probate, the executor will need to gather documents relating to the estate, including the original will, death certificate, and supporting documents regarding the deceased person’s assets and liabilities.

There are a number of steps involved in applying for a grant of probate in the ACT, including:

1. Advertising your notice of intention to apply for probate with the ACT Supreme Court;

2. Executing an affidavit in support of your application detailing the deceased’s assets and liabilities; and

3. Conducting a search of the Court Registry to see whether a previous grant has been made or any caveats have been lodged.

The details required for the application will vary depending on your circumstances and the complexity of the estate. If the Court is satisfied with the application, a grant of probate will be issued and the executor will then have authority to transfer or release assets to the executor or beneficiaries.

Letters of Administration

When there is no valid will, an application may need to be made to the ACT Supreme Court for letters of administration. This is an order of the Court that authorises an ‘administrator’ to manage the deceased person’s estate. The administrator's role is similar to that of an executor, but they are bound by intestacy laws, which dictate how an estate should be distributed when someone dies without a valid will.

The process for applying for letters of administration is similar to that of probate, however beneficiaries of the estate will need to be notified of the application. The affidavit in support of the application will also require some additional information, including details of the beneficiaries of the estate.  

Navigating these legal processes can be an overwhelming task in an already difficult time. Robinson + McGuinness are able to assist you with this process and offer fixed fees for preparing an application for probate or letters of administration. If you would like to discuss your situation and how we can assist you, please contact us today on (02) 6225 7040 by email info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Author: Amy Davis

Applications for an Appeal filed Out Of Time

While many family law matters are able to be resolved by agreement, there are some matters that require a decision to be made by a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.  In the event a Judge is required to make a decision, they will usually provide written reasons in support of their decision.

Parties who have received judgment in their family law matter have a period of 28 days from the date judgment was received to file a Notice of Appeal in the event they feel that the Judge has made an error such that a “miscarriage of justice” has occurred.  There are strict rules that must be complied with in the event a judgment is appealed; you should seek specialist family law advice before filing a Notice of Appeal.

Of course, there are some circumstances where a Notice of Appeal is sought to be filed after the 28-day period mentioned above has lapsed. This is known as filing “out of time”.  

In the event a party wishes to file a Notice of Appeal out of time, the appellant must first apply for leave to appeal out of time.  

The High Court case of Gallo v Dawson [1990] sets out the principles that the Full Court is required to consider when looking at an application for leave to file a Notice of Appeal out of time.  

Those principles require the Full Court to consider its discretionary power to extend the time for filing a Notice of Appeal in the event the appellant can satisfy the Court that strict compliance with the 28-day rule would result in an injustice between the parties.  When considering this:

A. The Court requires the appellant to show that an injustice will occur in the event the appeal does not proceed. The appellant does not need to show, at this stage, the deficiencies in the Orders that they seek to appeal; and

B. The Court cannot grant leave to file the Notice of Appeal out of time on the basis that the Court has doubts about the correctness of the Orders that are sought to be set aside.

As such, the first question to be determined by the Full Court is “has the applicant established that there is a substantial issue to be raised on appeal?”.

1. If the answer to this question is “no”, the then application for leave to appeal out of time must fail; however,

2. If the answer to this is “yes”, then the Court needs to consider:

a. The extent of the delay, and the reasonableness of any explanations offered with respect to the delay;

b. The history of the proceedings, and the conduct of the parties throughout;

c. The prejudice to each of the parties if leave was and was not granted for the appeal to proceed out of time; and

d. The need for finality to the ongoing litigation.

No two family law matters are the same, and while there can sometimes be similarities between cases each case must be assessed based on its own facts and circumstances.  In the event you are considering filing a Notice of Appeal out of time you should first obtain specialist family law advice in relation to the evidence that you can give in support of your application for leave, and the prospects of your leave application being successful.

It is important not to delay in the event you are considering filing an application to appeal out of time.

Contact Robinson + McGuinness to arrange an appointment on (02) 6225 7040, by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Peta Sutton

The issue of forum: when proceedings are commenced in Australia and overseas

The majority of applications for a property settlement that come before the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (“FCFCOA”) involve two parties who ordinarily reside in Australia and own property in Australia.  However, there are some matters where:

1. The parties ordinarily reside in Australia, however most of their assets are owned overseas; or

2. One or both of the parties do not usually reside in Australia, but they have property in Australia.

In these circumstances, it may be possible for the parties to invoke the jurisdiction of not only the FCFCOA, but also the courts of another country (i.e. where the parties are residing or where the property is held).  Commencing proceedings in another country, when the FCFCOA already has jurisdiction mostly occurs out of convenience, however it is also sometimes done for strategic advantage. 

If proceedings are commenced in FCFCOA by one party, and in another country by the other party, it will likely be necessary for the FCFCOA to decide whether it should continue to hear the matter.  In these circumstances, it is likely that the following two applications will be made in the FCFCOA:

1. The Applicant in the FCFCOA proceedings will likely seek an anti-suit injunction restraining the other party from continuing the overseas litigation; and

2.   The Respondent in the FCFCOA proceedings will likely seek a stay (or in other words a pause) of the FCFCOA proceedings to enable the overseas litigation to continue.

The FCFCOA will not lightly make the decision to stay its own proceedings; it has an inherent jurisdiction to permit the protection of its own processes from being used to bring about an injustice.

The High Court case of Voth v Manildra Flour Mills (1990) 171 CLR 538 outlines that the relevant principle to be applied by the FCFCOA in determining an application for a stay of the Australian proceedings is that of forum non conveniens. The relevant test associated with this principle is whether the Court in which the stay is sought is “clearly an inappropriate forum”.  The onus of establishing that Australia is clearly an inappropriate forum will be upon the party seeking the stay.

When considering whether Australia is clearly an inappropriate forum, the FCFCOA will look at:

1. Whether each Court has jurisdiction to hear the matter;

2. If the answer to 1 is yes, will each Court recognise each other’s orders or decrees?

3.  Which forum will provide a more complete resolution of the matters?

4.  In what order were the proceedings instituted?

5.  What stage are each set of proceedings up to?

6.  What costs have the parties incurred in each set of proceedings?

7.  The connection of the parties and their marriage with each of the jurisdictions and the relief that is available in each of the jurisdictions?

8.  The parties’ resources and understanding of the language – for example, can the parties participate in the proceedings on an equal footing? and

9.  The general nature of the case, taking into consideration the true nature and full extent of the issues involved.

The purpose of the above is not to compare the two jurisdictions or consider which is more appropriate; rather, the FCFCOA is to consider whether it is clearly an inappropriate forum having regard to the above.  If the Court finds it is clearly an inappropriate forum, it will be required to grant a stay of its proceedings.

However, if the stay application is denied, the FCFCOA will then consider any application for an anti-suit injunction.  Where the proceedings are the same (i.e. seek orders with respect to the same subject manner), the FCFCOA must give consideration to whether the continuation of duplicated proceedings is likely to be vexatious or oppressive.  Where the answer is yes, the FCFCOA may consider making an anti-suit injunction preventing the continuation of the other court proceedings.

Issues of forum can be complex.  It is important that the issue of forum is raised early, and without delay.  If you think this issue is applicable to your family law matter, you should seek advice from a specialist family lawyer without delay. Contact Robinson + McGuinness to arrange an appointment on (02) 6225 7040, by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Peta Sutton

Formalising your Property Matter: How to do it and is it necessary?

When you separate, you will often hear stories from family, friends or even friends of friends of their experience going through a separation or divorce. These stories are sometimes the ‘worst case’ scenario, involving lengthy litigation and long paths to resolution. However, this is not the only way. Where you have reached an agreement, you are not always required to enter the Court system.

Whilst some matters require the Court’s intervention, there are many matters which can resolve by direct negotiation, through correspondence via lawyers or at private mediation. Once you and your former partner have reached an agreement as to how to divide your assets, liabilities and superannuation, you will likely want to formalise that agreement as there are benefits in doing so. To do so, you have a number of options.

The most common approach is the ‘consent orders’ process. You and your former partner ( or your lawyers) complete an Application for Consent Orders (which provides the Court with some information about what you each own and the proposed property settlement), along with the Orders you seek that the Court makes to ‘effect’ your property settlement. The Court then sets a date to review the documents and if approved, will grant the Orders that you are seeking. If the Court does not consider that the outcome is ‘just and equitable’, the Court may decline to make the Orders you seek and request you to provide the Court with further information.

Another option is to enter into a Binding Financial Agreement. This is a private agreement which requires you and your former partner to each obtain independent legal advice from a lawyer. The Court does not review the agreement reached between you and you remain outside of the Court system. Due to the requirements of a Binding Financial Agreement, this option can be more expensive however it can be preferable in certain circumstances, and more private.

In some instances, you and your former partner may decide that you are willing to part ways without formalising your agreement. Any agreement reached should at least be communicated between you and your former partner in writing. This option may only be suitable in limited circumstances.

It is important to seek legal advice from a specialist family lawyer as to the most appropriate way to formalise the agreement reached between you. For example, there may be stamp duty exemptions applicable if you transfer property pursuant to a Court Order or a Binding Financial Agreement. If your property settlement involves a superannuation split, there are extra steps that you must take to ensure the Trustee of your super fund has been accorded ‘procedural fairness’ so they can (and will)  implement the superannuation agreement you have reached.

Robinson + McGuinness can provide advice on whether the agreement you have reached is a ‘just and equitable’ outcome, as well as the best way to formalise the agreement based on your individual circumstances. Contact us to make an appointment on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Anika Buckley

Family Law and financial disclosure: What you need to know

The Family Law Act 1975 and Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 sets out the obligations on parties to provide full and frank financial disclosure of their financial circumstances. Parties have an ongoing obligation to provide information and documents relating to their income, property and financial resources. Having transparency regarding the financial circumstances of the other enables parties to be able to negotiate a robust settlement, and indeed, a financial settlement cannot occur if the asset pool is unknown.

What information do I need to provide?

You have an obligation to provide information and documents in relation to income, financial resources, assets, liabilities, and superannuation in which you have a legal or equitable interest.

The obligation to provide financial disclosure only extends to documents which are in your possession or control. Generally, a party is able to access documents such as bank statements, Notices of Assessments issued by the ATO, superannuation statements, etc. A party may receive a request for disclosure documents where they cannot fulfill the request. This could occur, for example, where disclosure may be sought in relation to the quantum of a distribution received from an inheritance or compensation award, when the amount may not yet be determined.

Do I need to comply with all requests?

A request for disclosure should be answered within a reasonable timeframe, subject to the request for documents being reasonable, and relating to the issues in dispute.

If you have received a request for financial disclosure which you think is unreasonable, seek legal advice.

Is it sufficient to provide information about my financial circumstances?

By agreement, parties can exchange information relating to their financial circumstances, as opposed to a formal exchange of documents. However, a party is entitled to request documents, if that remains their preference.

Can I provide disclosure of the value of my interest in property at the date of separation?

It is necessary to provide financial disclosure in relation to the current value of assets, liabilities and superannuation. Although the value of property at the time of separation may be a relevant consideration, as well as what contributions have been made by each party following separation, generally the Court requires the most up to date information about the value of assets, liabilities or superannuation, rather than adopting the values of property as at the date of separation.

Do I need to provide more information after we have participated in an exchange of financial disclosure?

The obligation to provide financial disclosure regarding your financial circumstances is an ongoing obligation. It is necessary for parties to provide updates in relation to their financial circumstances  until a property settlement has been finalised, either by entering into Orders or a Binding Financial Agreement. That obligation exists irrespective of whether there has been a request for updating financial disclosure. If your financial circumstances materially change, there is an obligation to inform your former partner about that change.

What does this mean for you?

If you are uncertain about your legal obligations in relation to the provision of financial disclosure, or your former partner is refusing or delaying the provision of financial disclosure, you should seek legal advice.

It is prudent to obtain advice tailored to your circumstances from a family lawyer, ideally as soon as possible after separation, in order to preserve your interests. Contact Robinson + McGuinness to arrange an appointment on (02) 6225 7040, by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Margot McCabe

Digital Assets in Estate Planning

Technology has become an integral part of our lives and it is important to consider how you wish for your digital assets to be dealt with when making an estate plan.

In absence of a digital estate plan, your loved ones may find it difficult to manage your information after you pass away. Online accounts may be overlooked and funds held financial accounts may not become available to your beneficiaries. This could give rise to litigation due to inaccessibility or disputes about how they should be administered. Leaving accounts open indefinitely can also increase the risk of identity theft. 

Digital assets include the following:

1. Online bank accounts, cryptocurrency and e-wallets (eg. PayPal, Apple Pay)

2. Intellectual property

3. Social media accounts (eg. email, Facebook, LinkedIn)

4. Subscriptions (eg. Netflix, Spotify, Audible)

5. Loyalty programs (eg. Everyday Rewards, Flybuys, Qantas Frequent Flyer)

6. Online shopping accounts (eg. Amazon, eBay)

7. Photos (eg. phone or iCloud)

How to make a digital estate plan

Creating a digital estate plan involves leaving a clear system for your executor to manage your digital assets after you pass away. You should prepare a list of all of your online accounts, including your usernames and passwords, and determine what you would like to be done with each account. The list should be stored in a secure place and updated when your account details change.

You may wish to consider a password storage tool to manage your account information, such as 1Password, Lastpass and Bitwarden. These are secure and effective tools for managing your passwords and provide your executor with easier access to your accounts. They also reduce the risk of security concerns if you were to write your passwords down on paper.

You will need to appoint a trusted person to act as your digital executor. This person will be responsible for managing your digital assets, distributing funds to beneficiaries and closing your accounts. A digital executor should be appointed as part of your Will, which deals with your real and personal property.

It is open to you to leave instructions about who you would like to receive your digital assets and how you would like your accounts to be dealt with. For example, you may wish for your social media accounts to be memorialised, or for someone to continue managing a particular account. You should ensure your instructions are consistent with the service agreements of each digital asset as some platforms place restrictions on how your accounts are managed after you die. For example, Qantas Frequent Flyer points are automatically cancelled on death and cannot be transferred.  

It is important to create a digital estate plan along with your Will and Power of Attorney, however your digital estate plan should be separate to your Will. Your Will becomes public after you die so including detailed information in your Will can raise security risks. Having a separate document for your digital estate plan also means you can continue to update your plan as necessary without having to formally re-execute your Will. 

We offer fixed fees to review your estate planning and can assist you with preparing your digital estate plan along with your Will and Power of Attorney. If you would like further information or wish to update your estate planning with us, please contact us today on (02) 6225 7040 or by email info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Author: Amy Davis

Your guide to Parenting Communication Apps

Co-parenting can be difficult at the best of times. When you are separated and no longer have the daily contact that comes with living together, it becomes even harder to coordinate busy schedules and keep everyone informed about the latest events in the children’s lives. It can also be hard to manage finances, such as paying half of the children’s sports uniforms and registration fees for soccer next term.

Many of our clients find benefits in using a parenting-focused communication app. There are a number of communication apps out there in the market and today, we shed light on the most popular apps.

Talking Parents

Talking Parents, as the name suggests, is a good option for a parenting communication app.

The free version of the Talking Parents app can be accessed on their website only. Talking Parents allows you to send and receive messages and create shared calendar events.

The paid subscription services have more features, including recorded video calls (phone calls can only occur in the US), access to call transcripts and recordings and sharing and storing documents in the app.

It is worth noting, as Talking Parents is US-based, some features are not available in Australia (such as recorded voice calls and payment features). Talking Parents does not allow you to add a third party to view your account (and communications).

Current pricing: free, $9.99/month or $24.99 per month

What stands out: there is a free version, if you only want the standard features

For more information, visit: https://talkingparents.com/home

Our Family Wizard

Also created in the US, OurFamilyWizard has a number of great features, including:

• a shared calendar;

• message board;

•  journal (where you can share photos or documents);

• an expense log (which allows you to attach receipts); and

• an ‘info bank’ to store emergency contacts, vaccination records etc.

OurFamilyWizard is a paid subscription, which allows you to add third party accounts (such as including additional parents, grandparents and extended family members). Third parties are then able to access the family calendar and receive updates.

OurFamilyWizard also has a feature which allows your lawyer or mental health practitioner to ‘view’ your account as you would, meaning they can keep abreast of the issues you are experiencing and assist you in managing any conflict.

Current pricing: $154 for a 12-month subscription ($12.8/month) or $270 for a 2-year subscription ($11.25/month), 30-day ‘money back guarantee’ offered   

What stands out: this app has a number of great features, including ‘ToneMeter’ which identifies potentially emotionally charged comments which are worth thinking about before you send

For more information, see: https://www.ourfamilywizard.com.au/

2houses

Created in Europe, 2houses has an interactive calendar (which allows you to initiate a schedule change request, and the other parent can offer an alternate date for make-up time). The 2houses app synchronises with your usual calendar (i.e. iCal, Outlook or Google).

You can also manage your expenses on 2houses and communicate with the other parent. 2houses offers an information bank, with document storage and a summary of your child’s information (such as clothing size, useful contact details and more).

You can also request access for your lawyer so they can view your account, including schedules and communication.

Current pricing: $159 for a 12-month subscription ($13.25 per month), free 14-day trial

For more information, see: https://www.2houses.com/en

AppClose

AppClose has a shared calendar which also has ‘request’ features to manage any make-up time. There is a messaging feature which allows you to see whether your message has been viewed and when. There is an audio and video call feature (which can be disabled). You can send requests with documentation, such as a receipt. You can also export records if you need to share documents or records with yourself (or your lawyer).

Current pricing: free

For more information, see: https://appclose.com/

Other parenting apps available

There are a number of other parenting apps out there. Some include:

Ø  Cozi (a free app with a calendar + shared lists/notes, in-app purchases available)

Ø  FamCal (another free app with a calendar + shared lists/notes); and

Ø  WeParent (a paid subscription app with calendar and messaging features)

Whether you are engaged in a family law matter and need advice about which parenting app is most suitable for your circumstances, or if you need advice on negotiating arrangements with your former spouse, contact Robinson + McGuinness to make an appointment on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Anika Buckley

Reopening parenting proceedings: What is a material change in circumstances?

A commonly referred to parenting case, Rice & Asplund 179 FLC, set an important precedent that a finalised parenting case ought not be reopened unless the Court is satisfied that there has been a significant change in circumstances. The change does not need to be so significant that it would clearly result in a change to the orders, however the change or fresh circumstances must demonstrate a real likelihood of change being made to the orders.

So, in what circumstances has the Court found that there has been a significant change of circumstances?

• The relocation, or proposed relocation of a parent is a common basis upon which the Court will permit reopening of proceedings. In the case of Stern & Colli [2022] FedCFam C1A 95, at the time that final orders had been made by the (then) Federal Circuit Court of Australia in 2017, the Father had been living approximately four hours from the child, who lived primarily with the mother. He sought to reopen proceedings in 2020, after he had relocated such that the distance between the Father and the child was reduced to a 40-minute drive. The Father’s application to reopen was dismissed, however on appeal, the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court found that the Father had demonstrated sufficient reasons to reopen the parenting case. The matter was remitted for hearing.

• In the case of Shan & Prasad (2020) FLC, the Court at first instance dismissed the Father’s application to reopen proceedings. The Father had relied on new psychiatric evidence demonstrating the improvement in his mental health. On appeal, it was found that the evidence adduced by the Husband was sufficient to warrant the reopening of proceedings.

•   In the case of Westlake & Westlake [2019] FamCA 563, the Father’s application to reopen proceedings was dismissed. Final Orders had been made providing for the Father to have only supervised time with the children. He subsequently relied on evidence obtained from a psychologist, asserting that such evidence demonstrated an improvement in his mental health such that a reopening of proceedings was warranted. The Father’s application was dismissed, with reference to other expert evidence which showed the Father’s “personality with obsessional and narcissistic traits which are very well developed which do not equate to being a mental illness which can be treated”. Those findings satisfied the Court that there was no change in the Father’s fixed views of the Mother to justify reopening the proceedings.

• The change resulting from passage of time has been a circumstance in which the Court will consider reopening proceedings. A common example of this would be when orders are made for an infant, such that there is no provision for the child to have overnight time with one parent. Of course, over time, those orders become restrictive and no longer support the best interests of the child.

• If there are allegations of physical or emotional harm or abuse, sufficient for the Court to be satisfied that there is risk of harm, the Court has reopened proceedings.

• Parties may also make Orders by consent in recognition of a change in circumstance, however it remains open to the Court to refuse to reopen proceedings, or make further orders by consent, if there is not a sufficient change in circumstances.

Ultimately, the Court needs to determine whether it is appropriate to reopen a case based on the particular facts in each case. A change in a party’s geographical location or simply the passage of time may or may not demonstrate a change in circumstances adequate to justify the reopening of parenting proceedings.                                                                                                

For this reason, it is prudent to obtain advice tailored to your circumstances from a family lawyer, ideally as soon as possible after separation, in order to preserve your interests. Contact Robinson + McGuinness to make an appointment on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Margot McCabe

Exploring the Proposed Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975

In early 2023, following reviews by the Australian Law Reform Commission and the Parliamentary Joint Select Committee into Australia’s family law system, the Attorney-General’s Department published an exposure draft of the Family Law Amendment Bill 2023 for public comment. The primary focus of the proposed amendments is ensuring that the family law system prioritises and recognises the best interests of the child.

 The amendment Bill contains a number of proposed changes. Some of the most significant are:

The Removal of the Presumption of Equal Shared Parental Responsibility

Currently, section 61DA of the Family Law Act applies a presumption that parents should receive equal shared parental responsibility unless a party can show the Court that it is not in the best interests of the child. The removal of this presumption could make the process for obtaining parenting orders simpler for parties, which would in turn allow the Court to better focus on understanding the best interests of the child.

An Overhaul of the Factors Considered by the Court when Determining the Best Interests of the Child

In its existing form, the Family Law Act provides two main factors and thirteen additional factors to be considered when determining what parenting arrangement would be in the best interests of the child. The suggested changes see this being simplified to six factors of equal weight. There is also a seventh factor to be applied when the child identifies as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.

Requiring that the Independent Children’s Lawyer meet with the Child

Independent Children’s Lawyers are not presently required to meet with the child whose interests they are representing. It is being proposed that Independent Children’s Lawyers must meet with all children over the age of five, so that they are able to voice any views or concerns they may have in relation to the matter.

Restricting the Filing of Potentially Harmful Applications

The amendment Bill seeks to limit the filing of applications which may be especially harmful to the child and/or the respondent. Under the proposed changes, the Court would have the power to dismiss applications it believes are frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process.

Notwithstanding these proposed changes, navigating the family law system can be complex and confusing. To make an appointment with one of our experienced family lawyers please contact our office on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Author: Hannah Gibson

Steps to Consider Before Taking the Next Step.

It is an exciting milestone in a relationship to move in with your partner. Your partner may be moving in to your property, or you might be thinking about renting a property together.  

Whilst seeing a family lawyer can seem less romantic than picking out a new lounge, it can be useful to understand your rights in the event of relationship breakdown, particularly if you own a property or have significant savings or assets such as a share portfolio. 

People often have a misconception that if you own your property prior to living with your partner, you will automatically “lose” 50% of your property when you break up or that you will be able to “quarantine” it in the event of a separation. No relationship is the same and there is no hard and fast rule which entitles your partner to half of your property in the event of a relationship breakdown. Nor may your property interests be protected from a claim by your partner if you separate. 

When dealing with a claim for property settlement following the breakdown of a relationship (whether you are ‘de facto’ or married), the Court will first look at whether it is ‘just and equitable’ to make any alteration of your property interests. The Court then assesses contributions and future needs. 

For example, say you own a property in Canberra with your partner. You bought it 3 years prior to moving in together. During your relationship, you and your partner share finances and your partner starts to help you in repaying the mortgage. You decide to renovate the property and each contribute $100,000 towards improving the property (i.e. your partner is making financial contributions to the property). Each weekend, your partner spends hours out in the garden and does landscaping (they may be considered as non-financial contributions). You then split from your partner 20 years later. 

In this scenario, it may be ‘just and equitable’ to divide your interests in the property and your partner is likely to be entitled to a ‘share’ in your property as a result of their contributions (both financial and non-financial). 

Take another scenario where you owned your property outright prior to the relationship, having inherited it from your parents. Your partner moves in and you live together for 3 years. Throughout your relationship, you and your partner maintain separate finances and your partner makes no contributions towards your property. You ultimately break up after 3 years. In this alternate scenario, the Court may not consider it ‘just and equitable’ to alter your interests in that property as your partner may not have been seen to have made any contributions to it. 

There are a number of factors that may impact on the outcome of these scenarios, including what other assets, liabilities or superannuation are in the ‘property pool’, whether you have children together and each of your ages, health and other future needs. 

Whether you have been dating for 3 months or for a few years, if you are considering cohabitation, it would be beneficial to see a family lawyer to understand how the law operates and the impact moving in together may have on you / your assets.  You can make an appointment with us on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online  with one of our experienced lawyers to obtain advice.  

Author: Anika Buckley

How Long is Too Long? Court Dismisses Property Settlement Application After 30 Years

In the case of Estes & Holmes [2022] FedCFamC1F 267, the court summarily dismissed an application by the wife for an adjustment of property interests.  

The parties had separated 1985 after a 14 year marriage. The parties were involved in family law proceedings in 1988 and in 1989 a hearing occurred without the husband being present. Orders were made adjourning the property settlement proceedings until such time as the husband received his superannuation entitlements, which were the only property of any value at the time of those proceedings. At the time, it was anticipated that the husband may receive his superannuation entitlements in or about 2006. 

The Wife sought to commence proceedings in 2020 seeking orders for an adjustment of property interests. At that time, the parties had been divorced for 31 years. 

The Wife’s application was summarily dismissed, as a result of:

1. The delay in bringing the application. The Wife could have sought to have the 1989 proceedings relisted at an earlier time;

2. The Wife did not offer an explanation for the delay in bringing a fresh application for property settlement (or explaining her reasons for not having sought to relist the 1989 proceedings);

3. The Husband’s superannuation in 1989 was approximately $150,000 but he was now in receipt of the age pension and had minimal property in his name;

4. The Wife was not able to demonstrate that the Husband had been served with the Orders made in 1989 adjourning the proceedings, noting that he was not present at Court on that date, and was not legally represented. 

Although the Court has the ability to grant leave to parties who have applied for a property settlement “out of time”, there is no guarantee that any such application would be successful. In any event, bringing an application out of time results in increased legal costs whilst the Court determines the threshold issue of whether a party should be granted leave to bring such an application. In the case of Skelton & Lindop [2022] FedCFamC1A 47, the de facto wife applied to the Court when the parties had been separated for 2 years and 9 months (9 months “out of time”). 

At first instance, the primary judge dismissed the de facto wife’s application. On appeal however, the first instance decision was set aside, and the Court granted leave for the de facto Wife’s application to proceed out of time. Notably, it had taken over three years for the Wife’s application to be determined, by which time the parties had been separated for 5 years and incurred considerable legal costs, and the outcome of the property settlement itself had not yet been determined. 

What does this mean for you?

 The above cases demonstrate the risks associated with delay in formalising property settlements.

 It is important to know that there are time limits which impact your ability to seek an adjustment of property interests after separation or divorce.   

1. If you have been in a de facto relationship, you have two years from the date of separation to formalise your property settlement by entering into Consent Orders, or to bring an application to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, seeking orders for an adjustment of property interests.

2. If you are married (or divorced), you have 12 months from the date that a divorce order comes into effect to formalise your property settlement by entering into Consent Orders, or to bring an application to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, seeking orders for an adjustment of property interests. 

If you are a party to dormant family law proceedings which have been adjourned pending the retirement of one party, or until such time as a superannuation split can be effected, you should seek urgent advice in relation to your circumstances. 

It is prudent to obtain advice tailored to your circumstances from a family lawyer, ideally as soon as possible after separation, in order to preserve your interests. Contact Robinson + McGuinness to arrange an appointment on (02) 6225 7040, by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Margot McCabe

What Happens to Your Superannuation When You Die?

Superannuation is considered separate to your estate, which means special arrangements need to be made if you want to decide where your super will be paid. 

You can nominate beneficiaries for your super by a completing a death benefit nomination, which can be binding or non-binding. Binding death benefit nominations are written directions to a superannuation trustee which set out how you wish for your super to be distributed. If you have a valid nomination at the time of your death, the trustee is bound to follow it. Non-binding death benefit nominations are a written guide as to how you would like your super to be distributed, however the nomination is not binding on the trustee, who has ultimate discretion as to how to distribute your super.

Completing a binding death benefit nomination gives you greater certainty as to how your super will be distributed in the event of your death. If you don’t have a valid nomination in place, the trustee will need to make a decision as to how your super will be distributed, which generally involves investigating your relationships at the time of your death. Each super fund is different, and the decision will need to be made in accordance with the rules of the fund, as well as superannuation law. This can be a lengthy process, so having a valid nomination in place can also reduce delay in making payment to beneficiaries.

Who can I leave my superannuation to?

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (“SIS Act”) provides that death benefit nominations can only be made to your legal personal representative or a dependant. Dependants include children, spouses and people you have an interdependency relationship with (e.g. close personal relationships where you live together and one or each of you provide the other with financial and domestic support). A number of factors are taken into account when determining whether an interdependency relationship exists.

Parents and siblings generally do not satisfy the requirements of the SIS Act, meaning if you want your parents or siblings to receive your super, you should nominate your legal personal representative as your beneficiary to ensure your super benefit is paid into your estate. The funds can then be distributed in accordance with the terms of your will. 

Death benefit nominations generally lapse after a period of three years, so you should make sure you review your nomination if necessary. Some super funds offer non-lapsing death benefit nominations which do not lapse until you update or cancel the nomination.

It is recommended to review your estate planning arrangements every few years to ensure they still reflect your wishes. You should also consider reviewing your estate planning if there has been a change in your personal circumstances or financial situation. We offer fixed fees to review your estate planning arrangements and can assist you with preparing Wills, Powers of Attorney, and binding death benefit nominations. If you would like to discuss your circumstances and how we can assist you, please contact us today on (02) 6225 7040 by email info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Author: Amy Davis

Family Lawyer Property FAQ’s

Navigating a separation is difficult. Whilst every relationship is different, there are a series of questions that clients often ask in their first appointment with a family lawyer. Today, we answer some frequently asked property questions.

What do we do with our joint accounts?

If you have joint accounts, you may have a claim for an equal share of the monies held in that account. How much you are entitled to (and whether you are entitled to any) will ultimately depend on the likely division of your property pool, based on factors including the length of the relationship, your contributions and your respective future needs.

If you are worried about your former spouse ‘emptying’ the accounts, you can contact your bank and ask them to place a dual authorisation on the account (i.e. a ‘2 to sign’ feature) so you can review and authorise any transactions.

It can be prudent to avoid distributing funds from a joint account until you have reached an agreement, however this will not work for every matter as sometimes a party needs to access joint funds to support themselves or the children.

Can I still sell the house before we have negotiated a property settlement?

Sometimes people are concerned about achieving the best possible sale price, particularly in circumstances where there is a decline in the property market. If your property is in joint names, you should usually not sell your property without the agreement (or knowledge) of your former spouse. You might also need to obtain your former spouse’s agreement to sell the property even if the property is in your sole name.

If you both agree to selling a property, you can ask the conveyancers to hold the net proceeds of sale in their trust account. Trust account rules provide that conveyancers will then only release funds on your joint written instructions (similar to a ‘2 to sign’ feature).

What if I don’t know what we own?

We often see people who are not sure about what their property pool includes. This may be where a couple has not shared finances, or where one party has managed the finances throughout the relationship. If your matter is not in Court, you can utilise tools such as the national property ownership search or ASIC searches to understand an individual’s business or property interests in Australia.

Can I just get divorced without a property settlement?

You are not required to go through a formal property settlement before you apply for a divorce. It is important to know that limitation periods will commence upon your divorce, meaning you have 12 months from the date of your divorce to apply for a property settlement with the Court.

There are limited circumstances in which you can apply to the Court after this time, however it is a more costly exercise and there is no guarantee that the Court will allow your application (particularly if you do not have a good reason for the delay).

If you are not married but in a de facto relationship, you have 24 months from the date of separation to apply to the Court for a property settlement.

If you have separated and are looking to negotiate a property settlement, or if you have particular questions about what you should and shouldn’t be doing when it comes to your joint assets, you should seek specialist advice about your particular circumstances. Call us to make an appointment on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers to obtain advice.

Author: Anika Buckley

Can I Change My Child’s Surname?

The Family Law Act 1975 requires that parents endeavor to reach agreement about any major long term issue associated with a child. Major long term issues include matters such as which school to enroll a child, decisions relating to the child’s health, or the child’s religious or cultural upbringing. Another major long term issue specified within the Family Law Act is the surname used by a child.

If parents can’t agree about changing a child’s surname, an Application needs to be made to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia to seek orders for the child’s change of name. The Court also has the power to make orders restraining a parent from allowing or permitting the child to be known by a name other than their surname. Except in cases of urgency, parties to Court proceedings need to participate in mediation before commencing Court proceedings.

In the case of Chapman and Palmer, the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia said that when considering an application for a change of name (or considering whether to restrain the use of a name other than the child’s surname), the Court should have regard to:

1.   The welfare of the child as the paramount consideration;

2.   The short and long term effects of any change in the child’s surname;

3.   Any embarrassment likely to be experienced by the child if the child had a different surname to the parent with whom the child lives;

4.   Any confusion of identity if a child’s name were to be changed, or not changed;

5.   The effect that any change in surname may have on the relationship between the child and the parent that the child has previously shared their surname with; and

6.   The effect of frequent or random changes of name.

Although these factors have often been referred to in subsequent case law, these factors are by no means an exhaustive list of the considerations which the Court can take into account when considering an application for a change of name. Other factors have been considered by the Court, such as the parent’s desire for the child to be known by their original name, the degree of identification that a child has with their parent with whom they share their original surname and the degree of identification with a step-parent or partner of their other parent.

It is prudent to obtain advice tailored to your particular circumstances from a family lawyer. Contact Robinson + McGuinness to make an appointment on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers.

Author: Margot McCabe

Your Defined Benefit Superannuation Pension is in Payment Phase; So Does it form part of the Property Pool in a Family Law Case?

This question was explored in the 2022 case of Preston & Preston [(2022) FedCFamC1A 157] in which the Full Court heard an appeal of final property Orders made by a judge of Division 2 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The trial judge had Ordered a 58.5/41.5 division of the marital asset pool in favor of the Husband – with the Husband’s defined benefit military pension being included as a capitalized asset in the pool. The Husband appealed the trial judge’s decision on the basis that the judge failed to properly consider the nature of his military pension and incorrectly treated it as a capitalized asset in the pool available for division, as opposed to just an income stream.

The Husband’s defined benefit military pension was in the payment phase. The pension was only payable while justified by the Husband’s medical condition, however, both the Husband and the Wife acknowledged it was unlikely the pension would ever be reduced.

At the commencement of the trial, the Wife had initially sought a superannuation splitting Order but abandoned this position throughout the hearing. In her final submissions Counsel for the Wife did not contend for the pension to be counted as a capitalized asset, but anticipated its treatment as an income stream for the Husband. Notwithstanding the Wife’s concession regarding the treatment of the pension, the trial judge still counted the capitalized value of the Husband’s pension as an asset in the pool (even though neither party sought superannuation splitting Orders).

The Full Court found that the trial judge erred in including the capitalized value of the military pension in the asset pool. The capitalized value of the pension formed an integral part of his proportional share of the divided property, notwithstanding he could never liquidate it as an asset and its continued payment was contingent upon an ongoing future review of his medical condition.

The Full Court said:

From [11] “it was impossible to commute the military pension… and neither party ultimately sought a superannuation-splitting order in respect of it… so the expert opinion evidence of having a capitalized value of $638,109… lost its utility”.

At [14] “Her Honour concluded the husband had a significantly higher income-earning capacity than the wife… which in part stemmed from his indefinite receipt of the military pension…”

At [15] “There was no need to ascribe a capitalized value to the military pension when no splitting order was sought in respect of it…”

At [17] “Having been notionally counted as an asset in the balance sheet… the primary judges’ findings necessarily meant that the husband’s 58.5% share of the assets and superannuation incorporates the military pension at its capitalized value of $638,109, even though he does not and never will have that capitalized sum available for his use”.

The Full Court allowed the appeal and the final Orders were set aside. In re-exercising its discretion, the Court Ordered a 50/50 division of the marital asset pool, the difference being that the Husband’s military pension was treated as an income stream and was not included in the marital asset pool available for the division at its capitalized value.

Family law is specialized and complex. If you are separating and considering your options regarding a property settlement with your former partner, including one that will involve splitting superannuation, you should obtain advice from those qualified to assist you.

To make an appointment with one of our specialist family lawyers contact us today at (02) 6225 7040 or by email at info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Author: Ellen Russell

When Do You Call in the Experts? Expert Evidence in Family Law

Experts are commonly engaged in family law proceedings to address a gap in the evidence before the Court or to resolve an issue in dispute. Expert evidence is obtained by way of a written report in order to guide the parties to a resolution or to provide guidance to the Court as to the most appropriate outcome, in either parenting or property proceedings.

Expert evidence is frequently obtained in the following circumstances:

1. For an accountant to give an opinion as to the value of a business in property proceedings;

2. For a valuer to give an opinion as to the value of a house or other asset in property proceedings;

3. For a child psychologist to give an opinion about the most appropriate care arrangements for a child or children in parenting proceedings;

4.  For a psychiatrist to conduct an assessment and offer an opinion including a diagnosis as to the mental health and recommended treatment of one or more parties involved in parenting proceedings.

It is not a requirement in each case that expert evidence be obtained, however, it is uncommon for there to be no expert evidence. In property proceedings, if parties are able to agree on the value of assets, then there may be no need for the appointment of an expert.

A Single Expert, being an expert in the Court proceedings, can be appointed either by the Court or by parties to proceedings. One of the purposes of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Rules is to encourage parties to only obtain expert evidence in relation to a relevant and significant issue in dispute, to limit the costs of parties, and also to limit the risk to parties regularly obtaining expert evidence, or to “expert shop” if they do not accept the expert evidence they have obtained.

The Court Rules aim to reduce the prevalence of a party seeking to put before the Court expert evidence which interests their own case. It is generally preferable to appoint a joint expert, who receives joint instructions and therefore may be more inclined to offer an opinion that is balanced, considered, and will withstand scrutiny, as opposed to an expert who may become biased as a result of only hearing the instructions of one party.

A party may seek to leave to appoint its own adversarial expert, rather than appointing a joint expert. An adversarial expert can only be appointed however in certain circumstances, such as where it is argued the joint expert had insufficient qualifications or expertise in the subject matter about which they are providing an opinion.

The Court is not bound by the opinion or recommendations given by an Expert in Court proceedings. The Court can use its discretion in order to determine whether to rely on the opinion of an Expert, either in whole or in part.

To obtain specialist family law advice in relation to your matter, contact Robinson + McGuinness to arrange an initial appointment. Contact our office on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online to make an appointment with one of our experienced family lawyers.

Author: Margot McCabe

Spousal Maintenance and Maintenance Orders. What, Why, When, Where, How?

The Family Court has the ability to order that one party to a marriage (or a de facto relationship) pay spousal maintenance to the other if that party is not able to adequately meet their own reasonable needs.

What is spousal maintenance?

Spousal maintenance is the provision of financial support from one party to a relationship with the other (post-separation). Orders for payment of spousal maintenance may be made with the agreement of parties (i.e. by consent), or as determined by the Court. Generally, the provision of maintenance is aimed at enabling one party to meet their reasonable needs, as opposed to meeting discretionary expenditure, or for the provision of luxury items, such as holidays.

The “reasonable need” is generally considered as relating to expenditures such as housing, utility expenses, food, clothing, medical needs, etc.

Why does the Court make Orders for spousal maintenance?

Spousal maintenance may be ordered to be paid from one party to another if the ‘paying party’ is considered to be liable to maintain the other (and if they are reasonably able to do so).

The ‘receiving party’ must be unable to support themselves, as a result of:

1. Having the care and control of a child of the relationship under 18 years of age;

2. Their age or physical or mental incapacity to obtain employment; or

3. Any other adequate reason.

There are a number of factors that the Court can take into account when considering an application for spousal maintenance, including:

1. The age and state of health of the parties;

2. The length of their relationship;

3. The income of each of the parties, and their physical and mental capacity to obtain gainful employment, as well as their financial circumstances generally and financial resources available to them;

4. Whether one party has the care of children from the relationship;

5. A standard of living that is reasonable in the circumstances.

When can the Court order spousal maintenance?

The Court has the power to order that spousal maintenance be paid during a relationship or following separation. In the case of Eliades & Eliades (1981), the Court made Orders to the Wife in an intact marriage. There are time limits that apply as to when a party may seek that orders be made for spousal maintenance, and accordingly, you should obtain advice tailored to your circumstances in relation to a property settlement and/or maintenance as soon as possible after separation.

In terms of the frequency of the payment, spousal maintenance may be ordered to be paid either as a periodic payment (i.e. per week, fortnight, or month), or as a lump sum.

Where can an order for spousal maintenance be made?

Orders can be made for payment of spousal maintenance within Australia, and also in circumstances where a party is living overseas.

A maintenance order made in another jurisdiction may also be registered and enforced in Australia. You should receive advice tailored to your circumstances if seeking to register a maintenance order made overseas. The jurisdictional requirements are complex and vary from one jurisdiction to another, and whether an overseas order can be enforced in Australia is dependent on whether Australia has a reciprocal arrangement with the country where the maintenance Order was originally made.

How does the Court have the power to make an order for payment of spousal maintenance?

The Court has the power to make orders for spousal maintenance pursuant to Section 74 of the Family Law Act 1975, to make such order as it considers ‘proper’.

Adult child maintenance

In certain circumstances, the Family Court can also make orders for a parent (or parents) to pay adult child maintenance to a child aged over 17 years (or to the other parent for the benefit of the adult child). The Court will consider any medical and/or educational issues that may be preventing the adult child from being able to earn an income to support themself. The capacity of the parent being asked to pay the adult child maintenance is also a relevant factor that the Court must consider before imposing any order on a parent.

If you would like legal advice about your specific circumstances, including property settlement or spousal maintenance matters, contact us today at (02) 6225 7040 or by email at info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online.

Author: Margot McCabe

Relocation in Family Law Matters: What you need to know

Wanting to move to a new city, state, or country with your children is a common issue that arises in family law matters and is referred to as “relocation”.

So, what do you need to know about relocation matters?

1. If you want to relocate with a child or children, then you should try and talk to the other parent/s about your proposal to relocate. Attending family dispute resolution or mediation can be a useful step to discuss your reasons for wanting to move and to attempt to reach an agreement with the other parent, including what the relocation would mean for the children, for you, and for the other parent.

2. Often if an agreement is reached for the children to relocate with one parent, the children will spend more time with the “non-resident” parent during school holiday periods. If you can reach an agreement about the proposed relocation, it should be formalized by way of Consent Court Orders or a Parenting Plan.

3. If you cannot reach an agreement with the other parent about your proposal to relocate with the children, then you will need to make an application to the Court seeking Orders permitting you to relocate the children’s residence.

4. If you want to stop the other parent from relocating with a child or children, then you may elect to make an application to the Court seeking an order prohibiting the other parent from relocating the child’s residence outside a certain area or region.

5. If you unilaterally relocate the residence of the children without the other parent’s consent or without an order of the Court, there is a real risk that the Court may require you to return the children’s residence to the place that you moved from until the matter can be dealt with at a final hearing. This can cause significant disruption to your life, but more importantly to the children’s lives.

Issues of relocation are difficult matters for all parties, in particular the children and parents who are subject to Court proceedings. The effect of relocation generally means that the existing parenting arrangements, if there are any, will no longer be practicable and so new arrangements will need to be determined. The Court generally prefers to make decisions regarding a relocation on a final basis, after a final hearing, and not on an abridged interim basis.

If you are thinking about relocation with you children, or you want to stop another parent form relocating with your child, make an appointment with us on (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online with one of our experienced lawyers to obtain advice.

Author: Ellen Russell

Multi-purpose documents? Harman Undertakings & sharing the evidence

Following the breakdown of a relationship, you can find yourself facing multiple legal issues, including arrangements for the children, dividing property and in some cases, allegations of family violence arise. It is not uncommon for someone to be involved in proceedings before the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) (dealing with parenting or property matters), as well as proceedings before the ACT Magistrates Court.

As part of parenting proceedings, the FCFCOA sometimes will make an order for you and the other party to attend upon a psychologist for the purposes of preparing a Family Report. The Family Report is admissible in the FCFCOA proceedings; however you may consider that the report is useful to defend some of the allegations in the proceedings before the ACT Magistrates Court. Similarly, there may be certain evidence (including Affidavits or subpoena material) which would assist you in defending proceedings before the ACT Magistrates Court.

Where documents have been prepared for the purposes of proceedings before the FCFCOA, you are not automatically allowed to use those documents in proceedings outside of the FCFCOA. This is due to an implied undertaking or obligation to the Court (known as the Harman Undertaking), that documents prepared for the purposes of the FCFCOA proceedings will only be used for that purpose.

Separately, section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) imposes a restriction on the publication of any part of family law proceedings which identifies any person that is a party to or otherwise associated with those proceedings. However, this only relates to the voluntary broadcasting of information and does not apply to evidence to be given in Court.

In special circumstances, the Court may grant leave (or permission) for the release of certain documents (or parts of documents) to use in other proceedings (such as criminal or civil proceedings). The Court will consider whether there are ‘special circumstances’ (or a legitimate reason for the release of the document(s)) and whether there is any injustice caused to a party in providing that document.

You must make an application to the Court for leave to be released from the Harman Undertaking.  Where there is an application for documents to be released to the ACT Magistrates Court, it is likely that you will be able to argue that the document will remain confidential if it is just being released to the Magistrate. You should also consider whether you need a full document, or whether certain paragraphs of that document will be sufficient for the purposes of defending or supporting your matter before the ACT Magistrates Court.

In any event, it is important for you to seek advice from a lawyer if you wish to use certain evidence before the FCFCOA in proceedings before the ACT Magistrates Court. A lawyer can assist you with assessing the probative value of that evidence, and the process of obtaining the release of that document. Robinson + McGuinness is available to assist you with your family law matters and personal protection matters, including applications for release of documents.

If you would like advice in relation to your family law matter, contact our office at (02) 6225 7040 or by email on info@rmfamilylaw.com.au or get started now online to make an appointment with one of our experienced family lawyers.

Author: Anika Buckley